🔗 Share this article

An acclaimed author, a leading scholar of the old west, has authored a latest publication titled Brothers of the Gun, which examines the careers of the famed lawman and Doc Holliday. The historian notes frustration with the well-known phrase from a iconic western: “When the myth becomes fact, print the myth.”

“All researcher quotes it, they just overuse it,” Gardner comments lightheartedly. “And it’s actually not correct. I wrote a narrative. I want people to be immersed in the time, but I just get so weary of that line. The folklore is myth. It never become reality. People can recount the myth but it doesn't make it truth.”

The Infamous Shootout at the Corral

In Arizona's Tombstone, on October 26, 1881, Earp and Doc Holliday were participated in a shootout that came to be known as the Gunfight at the OK Corral. Alongside the Earp brothers, the pair met the outlaw gang, men sought for robbery and stealing. In less than a minute, three outlaws were dead and Doc was hurt, as were his companions.

Even though being one of numerous western scraps between lawmen and outlaws, it became myth, largely thanks to famous pictures including a classic western and Gunfight at the OK Corral.

Confusion and Variation in Historical Testimonies

“A large part of what we know about it is verifiable,” he noted of the real battle and its consequences. “But I always go back to one of the best quotes, and it’s a very straightforward statement. An observer, who observed the fight, stated: ‘I don’t know. Everything was chaotic.’”

Even the people present had varying versions. Evidence from the Spicer hearing is also murky. Observers who were associates of the outlaws were untruthful, and all version is somewhat distinct. It’s uncommon when a person agrees on anything.

“Everything was chaotic.” – a observer

“Including the individuals present were confused,” he continues. “So it’s genuinely hard to uncover it, and it happened in 30 seconds.”

Legend-Building and Film Depictions

Wyatt Earp lived into the film era, passing away in 1929 at the age of 80. First shown on a silent movie screen in 1923, he eventually became the subject of significant mid-century westerns. In more modern decades, he has been portrayed by a star in the 1993 film and another actor in Wyatt Earp.

He delves through such storytelling to uncover the men below. His books span the breadth of the American frontier, from a legendary figure and the sheriff to Jesse James.

Multifaceted Backgrounds of Earp and Holliday

Originating in Illinois in 1848, Wyatt was underage to fight in the the war, though he sought to do so. When he was 20, he became a peace officer in Missouri. Mistakes were made. He faced a calamity with the death of his partner, his young wife, from illness in 1870. Subsequently, as an officer, Earp kept public funds he gathered.

“We can't know why he held it,” he says. “He runs, and ends up in the frontier. He’s detained for swiping a mount, and then he’s in his home, and he’s managing a bawdy house. Eventually he goes back to the frontier, and he arrives in a booming town.”

In spite of his troubled past, Earp performed well as a lawman. The press praised him repeatedly. In one instance, he arrested a drunk man who had money on him. He held the cash for the drunk and returned it when he freed him from custody.

Different Characters of the Partners

Gardner emphasizes the stark distinction between the duo. Earp was aspiring, aiming to better himself and reach offices like sheriff. Holliday, born in Griffin, Georgia in the mid-19th century, was a dentist turned gambler. Different from Wyatt, he didn't display indicators of settling down.

“Holliday just moves from one boomtown to the next,” Gardner says. “He doesn't actually change. And a portion of that’s his addiction to wagering. Some of that is tuberculosis, managing that and using substances, whether it’s with whiskey or eventually opium.”

Impact and Academic Significance

This volume shows a intriguing facet of the American West: the conflict between authority and chaos, and the attempts of leaders to establish rule over developing communities. The amount of procedure that came after a shootout – inquiries, testimonies, directives for payment – might surprise those versed with romanticized versions of the era.

Additionally, Wyatt and Doc were involved in divisive politics. Earp was a member of the GOP, while local sheriff his rival was a Democrat, creating a conflict for control and position.

Finally, he refuses to romanticize these men. Wyatt and Doc passed time on both side